NASA to Retire Shuttle in 2010

So farewell then the Space Shuttle officially called the Space Transportation System, which will end its service in 2010. I feel some affinity for the reusable spacecraft as the project was formally launched the year I was born – 1972. I vividly remember waiting for the first launch in 1981 in front of a TV at primary school. I also remember watching Challenger explode live on TV.

NASA has decided to retire the space-plane due to growing concerns over the danger from falling foam insulation damaging the craft. This was the cause of the loss of Columbia and it seems despite measures been taken the risk is deemed to great.

The Space Shuttle concept was never a good design though. It's existence owes more to the wishes of the military than any good scientific or engineering reasons. The aim of a cheap reusable craft was never realised and rival space agencies routinely put payloads in orbit via simpler rocket systems.

The external tank, booster rockets and separate orbiter design of the Shuttle system is something of a cobbled together witch's broomstick and not the ideal way of getting payloads into orbit cheaply. The replacement and maintenance of the ceramic heat resistant tiles has been particularly costly and in retrospect another design of heat shield should have been used.

Human space exploration seems to really be lagging behind what is possible. The choice following the successful Apollo Moon landings was between a reusable space shuttle and a manned journey to Mars using Apollo technology. Unfortunately for those of us science fiction dreamers the decision was made to go for the project with military applications.

  • Bill Door
    Comment from: Bill Door
    28/06/06 @ 13:31

    To my mind (fuelled by low fi sci fi), the next stage in space exploration should be a Moonbase (of the Alpha persuasion or not). Built mostly underground, with a whacking great solar farm to provide power, it would be top. In fact, when I'm a multi trillionaire, it will be one of the top priorities I work on after sorting out a way to switch off the ageing gene. And cloning attractive women. Hmmm, I digress :)

  • Comment from: Harry
    28/06/06 @ 13:35

    I think the next stage should be an expansion in space station construction combined with a moonbase as you desribe. We'd then use these low gravity wells as base camps to explore other planets such as Mars.

    We could have done all this by now, if it wasn't for the politics and military meddling in scientific endevour.

  • Bill Door
    Comment from: Bill Door
    28/06/06 @ 13:50

    Yeah, being a bit more serious than I was in my first post (I think the idea of a moonbase is sound but my reasoning probably wasn't), If you think of the quality of the tec involved in the moon landings, what we could/should manage today should be much better. I understand that a lot of low tec stuff is still used in spacecraft as its pretty much indestructable and is easy to build redundancy in ("I'm sorry captain, we're about to lose air due to a BSOD. What's that? Try pulling the USB hub out? Well I'll try"), what we could do with some slightly more modern stuff using the moon as a base would be ace. The moon does have a permenent light side doesn't it? I think pyschologically its needed before we try Mars as we'd need to see if living on another planet/moon drove people nuts :D

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Log in now!

If you have no account yet, you can register now... (It only takes a few seconds!)